![]() ![]() Wikipedia also seems to think it's based on the 950/3100 family, but again, I have doubts. There is an Atom N400-related PDF document, but the section regarding the integrated graphics is so small and useless, it's pointless. Better of with the: Intel® Core 2 Duo T7250 (2.0GHz/800Mhz FSB/2MB cache) add 130 option. Biggest pro for x3100 is the 128bit memory structure vs. But for real, the x3100 has the same performance although it uses completely shared memory. Is there any definitive answer, with proof? I mean, I've tried to look at any form of Intel documentation (to see if Notebookcheck's claim is true), and came up with nothing (surprisingly!). It is partly, 128MB, up to 512MB shared it normally is. Anandtech even goes as far as to say it's just "a 45-nm die shrink of the 950," while Notebookcheck states it's "based on the X3100 (according to Intel)."Ĭlocks appear to be in line with either offering, whether it be a 200 MHz GMA 950, or a 400 MHz X3100, halved (and significantly made worse with 75% of its shaders removed). However, other sites out there like Anandtech state it's instead derived from either the 3100, or 950. Your database seems to think it has two unified shaders, hinting at the X3100. This leads me to believe the 3150 is based on the X3100. Neither the 950 or 3100 had unified shaders, but the X3100 did (8 of them). From my understanding, it has two unified shaders. Online, I've seen both the GMA 950/3100 family and X3100 mentioned. Unfortunately, I've come across somewhat of an inconsistency, regarding the GMA 3150 found inside Pineview Atom processors the inconsistency being where the 3150 is derived from. I'm in the process of producing a table of information, regarding specific Intel GMA chips.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |